Funding-CCTS Summer
Call For Pilot Applications; August 17, 2015
Call for Pilot Applications
The Center for Clinical and Translational Science at UK will
accept applications for pilot projects according to the following schedule:
v Call
for Applications: July 21, 2015
v Letter
of Intent and Biosketch (new NIH format) due: August
17, 2015
v Invitation
to submit Full Application: September 21, 2015
v Full
Application due: October 19, 2015
v Funding
Decision: January 2016
The categories of awards will
be as follows:
PILOT AWARDS FOR
JUNIOR INVESTIGATORS
This
award is intended to support pilot studies by early stage investigators to
obtain preliminary data for an eventual extramural grant submission. The
maximum award will be $25,000 which must be spent over 18 months. This
award is only open to investigators in the early stage of their career, or
investigators who are transitioning into a new area.
PILOT INNOVATION &
HIGH IMPACT AWARD FOR ALL INVESTIGATORS
This
award is for investigators at all stages of career development, junior, middle
level, and senior, and is intended to stimulate innovation and to support pilot
studies that will lead to extramural funding. The total award is limited
to $50,000 which must be spent over 18 months.
Please note that the following emphasis areas will be considered for this round of funding:
· Risk Related Behaviors with a focus on reducing
the risk-related behaviors of obesity, tobacco, or substance abuse.
· To support
collaborations between basic scientists and clinician scientists and to promote
clinicians scientists involvement in the proposed project, a supplement of up
to $25,000 for up to 10% effort may be requested for the clinician scientist.
For
questions, please contact Elodie Elayi
at elodie.elayi@uky.edu
Elodie Elayi
Research Development Director
Pilot Funding Program Coordinator
University of Kentucky
Center for Clinical and Translational Science
C300 AB Chandler Medical Center
800 Rose Street
Lexington, KY 40536-0293
Phone: 859.323.7939
Fax: 859.257.9560
Email: elodie.elayi@uky.edu
CCTS Investigators, please remember to acknowledge the NIH CTSA
grant in your publications.
“This publication was supported by the National Center for
Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational
Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through GrantUL1TR000117. The
content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily
represent the official views of the NIH.”
*************************************
Proposal Development Office
504 M.I. King Library
859-257-2861
http://www.research.uky.edu/pdo
Center for
Clinical and Translational Science
Call for
Applications
Pilot and
Innovation Research Program
The
UK Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS) is now accepting applications for Pilot Projects. The purpose of
this funding mechanism is to provide a new opportunity and resources to support
innovative, collaborative research relevant to the health challenges and
disparities faced by the nation and the citizens of Kentucky.
The
categories of awards will be as follows:
I.
JUNIOR INVESTIGATOR AWARD
This
award is intended to support pilot studies by early stage investigators to
obtain preliminary data for an extramural grant submission. The maximum award will be $25,000 which must
be spent over 18 months. This award is
only open to investigators in the early stage of their career, or investigators
who are transitioning into a new area.
Applicants must identify a mentor to assist with the investigator’s
training.
o
Eligibility
is limited to full-time faculty (all title series including regular, research,
clinical and special) of the University of Kentucky and affiliated institutions.
o Investigators who are PIs on other career development
awards or R01-type funding are NOT eligible.
o
Investigators
in training including residents, post-doctoral fellows, and clinical fellows
are NOT eligible to serve as PIs but may be co-investigators.
o Volunteer faculty and adjunct faculty
are NOT eligible to serve as PIs but may be co-investigators.
II.
INNOVATION AND HIGH IMPACT AWARD
This
award is for investigators at all stages of career development; junior,
midlevel, and senior investigators, and is intended to stimulate innovation and
to support pilot studies that will lead to extramural funding. The total award is limited to $50,000 which
must be spent over 18 months.
o
Eligibility
is limited to full-time faculty (all title series including regular, research,
clinical and special) at the University of Kentucky and affiliated
institutions.
o
Investigators
in training including residents, post-doctoral fellows, and clinical fellows
are NOT eligible to serve as PIs but may be co-investigators.
o
Volunteer
faculty and adjunct faculty are NOT eligible to serve as PIs but may be
co-investigators.
The Center for Clinical and Translational Science at UK
will accept applications for pilot projects according to the following schedule:
v Call for
Applications: July 20, 2015
v Letter of Intent due:
August 17, 2015
v Invitation to submit
Full Application: September 21, 2015
v Full Application due:
October 19, 2015
v
Funding Decision: January 2016
SCOPE:
Within the general
guidelines outlined above, the types of projects that will be considered within
this mechanism include projects that:
PRIORITIES FOR FUNDING:
The main priorities
for funding are: 1) the scientific merit of the project, 2) clear clinical and
translational relevance, and 3) the likelihood that funding will result in
submission of a competitive application for extramural funding. Where
appropriate, priority will be awarded based upon the strength of the research
team or, for junior investigators, the mentorship team. Other priorities for
funding include:
·
Significance of the clinical
and/or translational work in terms of potential health impact.
·
Capacity for overall impact on health of Appalachian
Kentucky, Ohio and West Virginia.
·
Scientific rigor and novelty of the proposed approach.
·
Experience and productivity of the investigators.
·
Multidisciplinary research teams representing the
basic, clinical and/or applied sciences
with an emphasis on bridging the divisions between basic and clinical
scientists.
·
Pilot studies
which generate critical preliminary data that will lead to subsequent
external funding and/or commercial development.
·
Risk Related
Behaviors with a focus on reducing the risk-related behaviors of obesity,
tobacco, or substance abuse. Special emphasis is accorded to high-impact
research, which tests a single risk-related behavior intervention or examines
the comparative effectiveness of multiple interventions in Appalachian or other
rural settings. The types of projects that might be considered within this
mechanism include, but are not limited to:
v
exercise or
nutrition/wellness programs,
v brief motivational interventions
v
treatments
grounded in behavioral or pharmacotherapy approaches
FUNDING INFORMATION:
Individual project awards (up to $25,000 in total direct costs for junior investigators and 50,000
in total direct costs for high impact awards over an 18-month period) will
be made on a competitive basis. Proposed costs should be commensurate with the
work. It is anticipated that funds will be available to support 2 high impact
and 2 junior investigator awards.
Sufficient justification and detail should be provided
to validate the need and cost of each item. The budget will be comprehensively
reviewed to insure that the funds being requested are relevant to the research
being proposed.
ALLOWABLE COSTS
·
Funds are to be used for the conduct of the project,
including supplies, subject payments, assays, etc.
·
Travel funds needed for study conduct are allowed, if
essential.
To support
collaborations between basic scientists and clinician scientists and to promote
clinicians scientists involvement in the proposed project, a research DOE supplement
of up to $25,000 for up to 10% effort may be requested for a clinician
scientist associated with the Junior Investigator or High Impact Awards.
·
Research DOE for Clinician Scientists –
Guidelines
1. Research DOE provided for clinician
scientist collaborating with basic scientist. The respective roles of the
basic and clinical scientist must be well described and both must be essential
to performing the project.
2.
Basic
scientist and clinicians as Co-PIs on pilot proposal; (i.e. clinician
involvement cannot be casual).
3.
Role
of clinician scientist must be different from standard of care clinical role.
If clinician involvement in the research project does not result in decrease in
generation of RVUs, then no additional research DOE should be requested for
clinician scientist. For example, if a clinician provides discarded tissue
samples from a procedure that does not require any additional time/effort, the
clinician’s involvement would not qualify for research DOE.
4.
Research
DOE for clinical scientist will be requested as an additional supplement to the
pilot proposal.
5.
Clinician
scientist may be physician, dentist, pharmacist, etc. but who has no available
research time on DOE at the present time.
6.
Clinician
scientist effort to be verified in letter of support from division chief and
department chair agreeing to the arrangement.
7.
CCTS
to provide up to $25,000 salary plus benefits and department/division must cost
share additional funding for minimum 10% effort.
8.
CCTS
will fund up to 2 clinician scientist supplements per pilot RFA.
NON-ALLOWABLE
COSTS.
·
Funding is not
available for thesis or dissertation projects.
·
Funding will not
be awarded as bridge funding for ongoing projects.
·
Facilities and Administrative costs: also known as
indirect costs are not permitted.
In
the event that additional intra/extramural funds are secured to support the
study outlined in your application you must immediately notify Elodie Elayi (859-323-7939, eel222@email.uky.edu).
Funds
will be held by the CCTS and the budgets invoiced for a period of 18 months
maximum, dependent on the nature and scope of the study. Individual principal
investigators will not be allowed to hold more than one CCTS pilot research
award at any one time.
Letters of Intent (LOI) and Biosketch
(BS) in NIH format will be solicited from faculty on all the campuses. The LOIs
will be reviewed and subject to a standard NIH-type study section assessment by
the CCTS Pilot Review Committee (PRC). A subset of meritorious LOIs will be
selected and applicants will be invited to submit Full applications.
Full proposals
will be subject to a standard NIH-type study section assessment. Each proposal
will be given a primary and two secondary reviewers.
Email LOI to:
Elodie.elayi@uky.edu - DEADLINE DATE for LOI: Friday, August 17, 2015
by 5:00 PM (EST)
The LOI
template can be downloaded here.
The BIOSKETCH
template can
be downloaded here. Note: the new format NIH biosketch
is required.
PILOT RESEARCH PROTOCOL
SUBMISSION PROCESS
Investigators are encouraged to contact Elodie Elayi (323-7939, eel222@uky.edu) to schedule a meeting to
review the basis of your submission, to learn how the CCTS Pilot Research
Program operates, to learn which CCTS services you might utilize for your study,
and to devise a budget for your protocol.
We also suggest that you consult with the
following:
Ř For Study Design
Consultation: Catherine Starnes, Statistician Assistant
(catherine.starnes@uky.edu)
Ř For help with your
Data Safety Monitoring Plan during protocol development: Lisa Tannock, MD,
Research Participant Advocate (lisa.tannock@uky.edu)
Ř For Biomedical
Informatics Consultation: Tammy Harper, MHA, (257-9384, .
CCTS PILOT RESEARCH PROGRAM APPLICATION
INSTRUCTIONS:
Applicants are
encouraged to review the instructions provided below carefully and to contact Elodie Elayi (323-7939, eel222@email.uky.edu) with questions. Incomplete or incorrectly prepared applications will
be returned without review.
Follow the steps below to apply for CCTS pilot research support:
·
For the application, margins must be no
smaller than 0.5” at all points.
·
Use an
Arial, Helvetica, Palatino Linotype, or Georgia typeface, a black font color,
and a font size of 11 points or larger. (A Symbol font may be used to insert
Greek letters or special characters; the font size requirement still applies).
·
Type
density, including characters and spaces, must be no more than 15 characters
per inch. Type may be no more than six lines per inch.
·
EACH page should provide the applicant’s name in the
upper right hand corner. The application should be numbered consecutively in
the center bottom.
*APPLICATIONS SHOULD BE ASSEMBLED IN THE FOLLOWING
ORDER*
I.
Cover
Page(s): (not included in the 6 page limit)
1. Title of the Project and Total Amount Requested.
2. The Category of Grant you are applying for: Junior award, High Impact award.
3.
Applicant’s
information for Principal Investigators
and Co-Investigators :
o
Name
o
Degree(s)
o
Rank, Title (s)
o
College
o
Department
/Division
o
eRA Commons Username
o
Campus Address
o
Contact
Information including e-mail and telephone number
4.
Mentor’s
information (Applicable only for junior investigators):
Name, Degree(s) and Rank, Campus Address, and Contact
Information
5.
Applicant’s
Chair Information for each collaborator:
Name, Campus Address, and Contact Information
II.
Detailed budget and budget justification in NIH format,
direct cost only
Allowable requests include:
·
Animal purchase and housing costs.
·
Specimen collection/analysis or testing
·
Participant reimbursement/recruitment costs
**Budget must be approved by Elodie Elayi BEFORE submission.
Applicants must account for fringe benefit
costs when considering research assistant salary levels. NO INDIRECT COSTS ARE
ASSIGNABLE THROUGH THIS MECHANISM.
Budget template can
be downloaded here:
·
Initial budget: link
·
Entire Budget
Period: link
III.
Body of the
proposal: (limited to 6 pages)
The format of the
application will follow NIH guidelines as outlined below.
State concisely the goals of the proposed research and summarize
the expected outcome(s), including the impact that the results of the proposed
research will exert on the research field(s) involved.
List succinctly the specific objectives of the research proposed, e.g., to test a stated hypothesis, create a novel design, solve a specific problem, challenge an existing paradigm or clinical practice, address a critical barrier to progress in the field, or develop new technology.
Organize the Research Strategy in the specified order
and using the instructions provided below. Start each section with the appropriate
section heading—Significance, Innovation, Approach. Cite published experimental
details in the Research Strategy section and provide the full reference in the
Bibliography section. Given
the length of the application, investigators should strive to provide a
relevant, although not exhaustive bibliographic review (described below)
(a)
Significance
·
Explain the importance of the problem or
critical barrier to progress in the field that the proposed project addresses.
·
Explain how the proposed project will
improve scientific knowledge, technical capability, and/or clinical practice in
one or more broad fields.
·
Describe how the concepts, methods,
technologies, treatments, services, or preventative interventions that drive
this field will be changed if the proposed aims are achieved.
(b) Innovation
·
Explain how the application challenges
and seeks to shift current research or clinical practice paradigms.
·
Describe any novel theoretical concepts,
approaches or methodologies, instrumentation or intervention(s) to be developed
or used, and any advantage over existing methodologies, instrumentation or
intervention(s).
·
Explain any refinements, improvements,
or new applications of theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies,
instrumentation or interventions.
(c) Approach
·
Describe the overall strategy,
methodology, and analyses to be used to accomplish the specific aims of the
project. Include how the data will be collected, analyzed, and interpreted as
well as any resource sharing plans as appropriate.
·
Discuss potential problems, alternative
strategies, and benchmarks for success anticipated to achieve the aims.
·
If the project is in the early stages of
development, describe any strategy to establish feasibility, and address the
management of any high risk aspects of the proposed work.
·
Clearly describe how each partner will
be engaged in the development and/or implementation of the pilot study. (Applicable for partnership applications)
As
applicable, also include the following information as part of the Research
Strategy, keeping within the three sections listed above: Significance,
Innovation, and Approach.
·
Preliminary Studies.
Include information on Preliminary Studies. Discuss the PI’s preliminary
studies, data, and/or experience pertinent to this application. Preliminary data can be an essential part of
a research grant application and help to establish the likelihood of success of
the proposed project.
IV.
APPENDIX:
· Biosketch in NIH format (note: the new biosketch
format is required!)
· Protection of human subjects section and animal
assurances (if applicable)
·
References- Authors, year, title and journal
information is expected for each citation. Given the length of the application,
investigators should strive to provide a relevant, although not exhaustive review.
(Not more than 2-3 pages)
·
The required endorsement letter from the primary
mentor for new investigators (see below), as well as letters
from key personnel must be included. Relevant assessment materials may be
included if they are
of reasonable length and significantly enhance the review of the application.
DO NOT submit published
manuals, materials in the public domain or similar materials. This is NOT a
means of extending the
length of the proposal itself.
·
MENTORING AND CAREER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (new
investigators): Role and qualification of mentor(s). Inclusion of a clinician
(physician, dentist, pharmacist, clinical psychologist, physical therapist,
etc.) mentor is highly desirable in studies involving direct interaction with
human participants. A career development plan must be in place to enhance
clinical and translation research capabilities. This may include didactic
coursework, the Clinical and
Translational Science Seminar Series, and/or the Translational Science
Spring/Fall Conference.
·
MENTOR ENDORSEMENT (new investigators): To facilitate
the effectiveness of the CCTS Pilot Research Program in enhancing the research
development of newly appointed faculty investigators, new investigators must
provide a letter of endorsement and collaboration from a senior investigator
who is willing to serve as a mentor for the applicant over the course of the
project. This person must possess a M.D., Ph.D., PharmD
or other doctoral degree and must have sufficient clinical research expertise
to serve as a mentor to the applicant. The letter should reflect the amount of
time the mentor is willing/able to direct to this role as well as the specific
types of activities that will be involved. These activities should include
reviewing progress on the project, reviewing initial data, helping plan for
future project funding after the pilot phase, discussing relevant research
articles or related activities. It is NOT required that the mentor have funded
effort. This letter should be included
in the appendix material of the application.
·
LETTER FROM SUPERVISOR/DEPARTMENT CHAIR: A letter
signed by the immediate supervisor (e.g. Division Chief) and/or Department
Chair that includes acknowledgement of their support for the project and
providing assurance that sufficient protected time to complete the research
will be available. No specific amount of protected time is required, but the
review committee will consider the distribution of effort and other activities
of the applicant.
REVIEW PROCESS & CRITERIA:
Your submission will initially be administratively
reviewed. You will be notified if portions are missing or incomplete. The
application will be sent to a minimum of two internal or external reviewers
with expertise in fields relevant to the science in the proposal. These
reviewers will be asked to disclose any relationships to the grant applicant. Full proposals will be subject to a standard NIH-type
study section assessment. The reviewers
will then provide written feedback addressing the merits of the protocol. All
applications will be scored based upon the written reviews, relevance to the
Priorities and Scope outlined above, and the overall relevance to the long term
goals of the CCTS. You will be notified of the outcome.
The general criteria for review include:
Overall
Impact
Clinical
Significance Is the study relevant to human health and the health
of Kentucky citizens?
Innovation Are
the aims original and concepts novel? Are novel methodologies proposed?
Approach Do
the specific aims test the hypotheses? Are statistical considerations provided?
Is the risk/benefit ratio acceptable?
Investigators Is
this a new investigator? If so, a mentorship team must be identified. The
qualification and experience of the mentor, and their plan for career
development for the new investigator, will be an important aspect of review.
Does the investigative team have training, expertise, and experience to conduct
the proposed study?
Environment Is
the environment strong? Do the investigators take advantage of available
expertise? Is there a transdisciplinary team involved in the study?
Feasibility Is
the study feasible from the perspective of recruitment and availability of
resources?
Potential Will
the pilot study generate new knowledge that can be published? Will completion
of the study lead to external funding or development of a novel or
translational methodology? Is there commercial potential?
AWARDEE RESPONSIBILITIES:
·
Once your protocol is fully approved and funding
awarded, you should contact Elodie Elayi, (323-7939, eel222@uky.edu) to schedule a working
meeting with the CCTS units involved with your protocol.
·
Successful applicants will be required to provide
semi-annually progress reports and a final written report describing project accomplishments must be submitted within 60 days of the project end date.
·
The UK CCTS is evaluated by the NIH on its
effectiveness in stimulating new research findings and publications. The following support acknowledgement
should be included on all publications that result from CCTs support :
“This publication was
supported by the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center
for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through
Grant UL1TR000117.
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not
necessarily represent the official views of the NIH”
RELEASE OF FUNDS:
·
Funding for successful application will be released upon receipt of
applicable IRB/IACUC approval, if applicable.
·
If required IRB/IACUC approval is not provided within a period of 90
days after the announcement of the award, THE
FUNDS WILL BE SUBJECT TO CANCELLATION.
LETTER OF INTENT
CCTS 2015 PILOT GRANT
DEADLINE: August 17, 2015-5:00 PM
1.
PROJECT FULL
TITLE: |
2.
Principal Investigator (s) Information
NAME |
|
DEGREES |
|
TITLE(s) |
|
COLLEGE |
|
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION |
|
OFFICE ADDRESS |
|
EMAIL ADDRESS |
|
PHONE |
|
eRA COMMONS USERNAME |
|
|
|
NAME |
|
DEGREES |
|
TITLE(s) |
|
COLLEGE |
|
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION |
|
OFFICE ADDRESS |
|
PHONE |
|
EMAIL ADDRESS |
|
eRA COMMONS USERNAME |
|
3.
Mentor Information (only applicable to Junior Investigators)
NAME |
|
DEGREES |
|
TITLE(s) |
|
COLLEGE |
|
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION |
|
OFFICE ADDRESS |
|
PHONE |
|
EMAIL ADDRESS |
|
PROJECT INFORMATION
1.
CATEGORY OF GRANT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR:
JUNIOR INVESTIGATOR AWARD
INNOVATION AND HIGH IMPACT AWARD
YES
NO
2.
HAVE YOU RECEIVED PREVIOUS UK PILOT FUNDS?
A
two pages letter of intent is solicited from applicants. No appendices are allowed. No references
required.
Application
Guidelines: The format of the
application should follow the NIH guidelines outlined below.
·
Margins must be no
smaller than 0.5” at all points.
·
Use an Arial, Helvetica, Palatino Linotype, or Georgia
typeface, a black font color, and a font size of 11 points or larger. (A Symbol
font may be used to insert Greek letters or special characters; the font size
requirement still applies).
·
Type density, including characters and spaces, must be no
more than 15 characters per inch. Type may be no more than six lines per inch.
·
EACH
page should provide the applicant’s name in the upper right hand corner. The
application should be numbered consecutively in the center bottom.
·
Failure
to follow these guidelines will result in the return of the LOI without review.
THE
TWO PAGES LOI SHOULD BE ASSEMBLED IN THE
FOLLOWING ORDER
1.
PROJECT TITLE
(Full Project Title required)
2.
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES, SPECIFIC AIMS
Provide concise, clear statements
regarding anticipated outcomes of the proposed research and how it will add to
existing knowledge or create value
3. BRIEF
BACKGROUND AND PRELIMINARY DATA (if data are available)
4. A SECTION DESCRIBING
STUDY DESIGN, METHODOLOGY AND OUTCOMES
5. PROJECT
MILESTONE
6. DESCRIBE HOW
THE PILOT GRANT WOULD FACILITATE A FUTURE EXTERNAL GRANT
OMB No. 0925-0001/0002 (Rev. 08/12 Approved Through 8/31/2015)
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH
Provide the following information for the Senior/key
personnel and other significant contributors.
Follow this format for each person. DO
NOT EXCEED FIVE PAGES.
NAME:
eRA COMMONS USER NAME (credential, e.g., agency
login):
POSITION TITLE:
EDUCATION/TRAINING
(Begin with baccalaureate or
other initial professional education, such as nursing, include postdoctoral
training and residency training if applicable. Add/delete rows as necessary.)
INSTITUTION
AND LOCATION |
DEGREE (if applicable) |
Completion
Date MM/YYYY |
FIELD OF
STUDY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE:
The Biographical Sketch may not exceed five pages. Follow the formats and
instructions below.
Briefly
describe why you are well-suited for your role in the project described in this
application. The relevant factors may include aspects of your training; your
previous experimental work on this specific topic or related topics; your
technical expertise; your collaborators or scientific environment; and your
past performance in this or related fields (you may mention specific
contributions to science that are not included in Section C). Also, you may identify up to four peer
reviewed publications that specifically highlight your experience and
qualifications for this project. If you
wish to explain impediments to your past productivity, you may include a
description of factors such as family care responsibilities, illness,
disability, and active duty military service.
List in chronological order previous positions, concluding
with the present position. List any honors. Include present membership
on any Federal Government public advisory committee.
Briefly
describe up to five of your most significant contributions to science. For each
contribution, indicate the historical background that frames the scientific
problem; the central finding(s); the influence of the finding(s) on the
progress of science or the application of those finding(s) to health or
technology; and your specific role in the described work. For each of these
contributions, reference up to four peer-reviewed publications or other
non-publication research products (can include audio or video products; patents;
data and research materials; databases; educational aids or curricula;
instruments or equipment; models; protocols; and software or netware) that are relevant to the described contribution. The
description of each contribution should be no longer than one half page including
figures and citations. Also provide a URL to a full list of your published work
as found in a publicly available digital database such as SciENcv
or My Bibliography, which are maintained by the US National Library of
Medicine.
List
both selected ongoing and completed research projects for the past three years
(Federal or non-Federally-supported). Begin
with the projects that are most relevant to the research proposed in the
application. Briefly indicate the overall goals of the projects and
responsibilities of the key person identified on the Biographical Sketch. Do
not include number of person months or direct costs.